% ideally this would go on your company letterhead.
\documentclass[12pt]{letter}
\address {
% your address here: (ideally 'office of CEO/CIO' of your company)
My name\\
My address\\
My town, ST 00000}
% your name here:
\signature{(your name)}
\date{\today}

\begin{document}
\begin{letter}{
% insert your representative's address here
Elaine M. Farrell\\
Office of House Counsel\\
Room 139, State House\\
Boston, MA 02133}

\opening{Dear
% insert state name
NCCUSL Representative:}

We are writing to express our opposition to the adoption of Uniform
Computer Information Transactions Act (UCITA). If enacted, UCITA would
increase our cost of doing business and adversely affect the economy
of the states in which we operate.
%Please note that we operate the following facilities in your state.

This increased cost of doing business would likely impact employment,
tax revenue, and the competitiveness of our operations in the world
economy.

The current UCC fairly balances the interests of buyer and
seller. Proposed UCITA is irreparably flawed in that it dramatically
shifts this balance in favor of the seller. This imbalance pervades the
provisions of UCITA in both blatant and numerous subtle nuances woven
throughout the law.

For example, a partial list of some of the blatant provisions follows:

\begin{enumerate}
\item Seller's unilateral right to electronically disable software
      (``Self Help'').
\begin{itemize}
\item All medium and large businesses, and most small businesses, rely
on computer software to perform critical daily tasks, such as running
their manufacturing processes, paying suppliers and employees,
calculating and remitting taxes, and controlling pollution. Because of
their complexity, business software systems are often very expensive
and cannot easily be replaced.
\item UCITA would allow software companies to exploit this
vulnerability and threaten disruption of these critical systems if
their demands are not met.
\item UCITA assumes the customer is guilty until proven innocent. The
customer must run to court to try to stop this Draconian ``remedy.''
\item There is a huge potential here for misuse and harm to businesses
and the communities in which they operate.
\end{itemize}

\item Reduced warranties. 
\begin{itemize}
\item Language that disclaims an implied warranty must be conspicuous
only in the narrowly defined ``mass-market.'' This is a trap for the
unwary.
\item UCITA reduces the implied warranty of noninfringement to apply
only to U.S. rights, even if the license granted is worldwide. It is
important to note here that the essence of a software transaction is a
presumption that the software company has the right to grant the
license, free of infringement.
\end{itemize}

\item Abandonment of the seller's obligation to deliver a working
product (``Perfect Tender'').
\begin{itemize}
\item If the software fails to conform to the contract, only a
``mass-market'' customer may refuse to accept it.
\item The mass-market definition has been very carefully crafted to
exclude entire market segments. For example, most businesses would
lose the protection they have under current law.
\end{itemize}

\item Uncertainty of the time period of the right to use a product.
\begin{itemize}
\item In almost all cases today, software is licensed for a perpetual
time period.
\item Instead of reflecting this commercial reality, UCITA opens the
door to needless mischief, litigation and expense, by introducing the
concept of ``time reasonable'' for the duration of a license.
\end{itemize}

\item Unreasonable obligation placed upon the buyer to discover
defects during an evaluation.
\begin{itemize}
\item Software companies understandably take the position that, even
with all their resources and intimate knowledge of their software
products, they are unable to test them adequately in order to warrant
them as being error-free.
\item UCITA, however, assumes that the customer will be able to
discover any and all defects in software during a short trial period
(usually 30 to 90 days). Evaluation of software can negate the implied
warranty for defects that the software company deems could have been
discovered.
\end{itemize}

\item Uncertainty in the scope of license
\begin{itemize}
\item UCITA arbitrarily restricts the number of users under a site or
enterprise-wide license to what it deems ``reasonable in light of
the\ldots{}commercial circumstances'', even though these types of licenses
have traditionally permitted an unlimited number of users.
\item This is another trap for the unwary licensee, who may suddenly
find that the scope of its license is not as broad as currently
defined by usage of trade.
\end{itemize}

\end{enumerate}

This list is by no means exhaustive, but merely an example of some of
the most obvious points of prejudice against the buyer.  However, it
is important to note that the entirety of UCITA is so permeated with
bias in favor of the seller that addressing only a few key points
cannot rectify it.

We oppose and, as your constituents, urge you to oppose this
irreparably flawed measure.

Thank you for your efforts on behalf of our company and its
% insert number of
employees.

\closing{Sincerely,}
\end{letter}

\end{document}